[< Previous 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next >]
[< Previous 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next >]
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Poster |
Thread |
jarrydsNIZ12 |
Posted: 2009/5/6 3:36 Updated: 2009/5/6 3:36 |
Home away from home Joined: 2009/3/17 From: Brisbane Posts: 465 |
Re: 1600 L20 twin dellorto's nice the whole cars plain.. but they look sooooo good
|
|
|
Poster |
Thread |
selfwedge |
Posted: 2004/6/10 8:23 Updated: 2004/6/10 8:23 |
Home away from home Joined: 2004/6/8 From: Palmie, New Zealand Posts: 155 |
Re: 1600 L20 twin dellorto I really do like the front twin headlights of 16s, and the fact theyre a littel bigger and full independant suspension meaning they can be lowered more than the 1200, but all of this doesnt compare to the fact that the 1600 has a god damn hideous back on it, its far too plain, the lights are ugly, theres too much plain blank space between the lights and the rear bumper and that angle, eww if they could have just fixed that it would be a very very beautiful car, has anyone seen pictures of a 1600 with 1200 taillights?
|
|
|
|
Poster |
Thread |
Dodgeman |
Posted: 2004/6/10 10:40 Updated: 2004/6/10 10:40 |
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster) Joined: 2003/6/27 From: Southern Tablelands N.S.W. Australia Posts: 8287 |
Re: 1600 L20 twin dellorto They are so damn hideous that they are the most popular of the Px10 series. Umm, that doesn't make much sense. Either they aren't popular, or they aren't ugly. It's gotta be one or the other.
What does everyone else think? P.S. I will happily trade my 200B wagon for a 1600 wagon in similar condition. Any takers?
|
|
|
|
Poster |
Thread |
Regulator |
Posted: 2004/6/10 7:49 Updated: 2004/6/10 7:49 |
Home away from home Joined: 2004/5/19 From: CHristchurch, New Zealand Posts: 216 |
Re: 1600 L20 twin dellorto That is sweet. Damn thats nice.
|
|
|