User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Main Menu
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search

Advanced Search
Google Ad

Main : Misc : Tech Section Bumper and Chassis Strengthening, 1973

[<   Previous  409  410  411  412  413  414  415  Next   >]

Bumper and Chassis Strengthening, 1973
Bumper and Chassis Strengthening, 1973Popular
SubmitterddgonzalMore Photos from ddgonzal   Last Update2005/7/15 4:29    Tell a friendTell a friend
Hits4429  Comments8    0.00 (0 votes)0.00 (0 votes)
Equipment Variation, Page 11

[<   Previous  409  410  411  412  413  414  415  Next   >]

The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

Poster Thread
ddgonzal
Posted: 2005/7/15 4:39  Updated: 2005/7/15 4:39
Moderator
Joined: 2001/5/3
From: 48 North
Posts: 31575
 Re: Bumper and Chassis Strengthening, 1973
"chassis is also strengthened". Hmmm ... I guess a 73 is better ...

At the front, the sheet metal at the bumper stay attachment point is reinforced, as is the tension-rod bracket, which might be a weak part of the 1200, at least it broke a couple of times on my '72 1200 during off-roading.

5 Reinforcement-tension rod bracket Modified

8 Panel-apron modified (shape of and surface of bumper stay mounting notch)

Poster Thread
dattodude
Posted: 2005/7/15 7:12  Updated: 2005/7/15 7:12
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster)
Joined: 1998/12/6
From: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5806
 Re: Bumper and Chassis Strengthening, 1973
Better?... Nope, just heavier

Poster Thread
datsunbeginner
Posted: 2016/7/11 4:37  Updated: 2016/7/11 4:37
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster)
Joined: 2010/6/2
From: Toowoomba & New Jersey USA
Posts: 2341
 Re: Bumper and Chassis Strengthening, 1973
The tech wiki fails to mention a 73 bumper with 73 mounts does not fit on a 71 or 72 body

Poster Thread
ddgonzal
Posted: 2016/7/11 12:25  Updated: 2016/7/11 12:25
Moderator
Joined: 2001/5/3
From: 48 North
Posts: 31575
 Re: Bumper and Chassis Strengthening, 1973
Good catch. Go ahead and add that information (in the Bumpers article, click Edit)

Poster Thread
datsunbeginner
Posted: 2016/7/11 23:54  Updated: 2016/7/11 23:54
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster)
Joined: 2010/6/2
From: Toowoomba & New Jersey USA
Posts: 2341
 Re: Bumper and Chassis Strengthening, 1973
I found out the hard way :)

Just edited the page, thanks!

Poster Thread
ddgonzal
Posted: 2016/7/19 22:13  Updated: 2016/7/19 22:17
Moderator
Joined: 2001/5/3
From: 48 North
Posts: 31575
 Re: Bumper and Chassis Strengthening, 1973
What exactly didn't fit? Guys have used the 1973 bumpers on earlier 1200s, one guy said as long as you use the early stays, the 1973 bumper will bolt on the car

Are the bolt holes in a different location? Maybe if you slot the holes in the stay, the 1973 stays will fit other 1200s?

Poster Thread
datsunbeginner
Posted: 2016/7/22 19:13  Updated: 2016/7/22 19:13
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster)
Joined: 2010/6/2
From: Toowoomba & New Jersey USA
Posts: 2341
 Re: Bumper and Chassis Strengthening, 1973
The 73 bumper and 73 bumper stays do not fit the mounting holes of the 71 coupe body. I was able to get one of the holes to fit but it required bending the front apron body panel.

I don't believe your guy is correct with regard to early stays fitting a 73 bumper. The holes in the bumper itself do not align with an early stay

Poster Thread
ddgonzal
Posted: 2016/7/23 12:50  Updated: 2016/7/23 12:50
Moderator
Joined: 2001/5/3
From: 48 North
Posts: 31575
 Re: Bumper and Chassis Strengthening, 1973
Thanks for that information. I suspect the guy drilled new holes in the 1973 bumper, so that he could bolt it to the early stays