|
|
| Re: ca18de pricing |
Subject: Re: ca18de pricing
by mely1200 on 2001/6/29 2:26:00
The SR is a much better engine. And it would be much easier than fiddling with the plumbing for the ca18det.
Another mate of mine has a ca18de in a 1600, and the SR20de in the 200B pulls much harder. Both R stock. But the SR is a bit more expensive up front. The internals in the SR stock
are stronger than the stock CA ones.
It depends what U want, if you want to bust wheelies for 2 gears, then put some tough internals in the ca18det, crank up the boost and away you go. But if you just want a car with a
spirited ride, then the SR non turbo would be better than the CA non turbo.
The only reason the SR20de would be cheaper on insurance is that it is non turbo, vs the CA18det.
mely
|
|
