|
Re: SR20VE vs F22C vs VQ35/7 best power TQ to engine weight | Subject: Re: SR20VE vs F22C vs VQ35/7 best power TQ to engine weight by D on 2019/9/18 3:37:56
Sold on the NA VQHR 300hp atw! from factory with some pipes
Mate put me through this vid which is a great conversion for the HOnda civic guys that want something cheaper than the K series which is skyrocketing and yet makes no where near the torque of a v6 However these J swapped civics cant crack 400hp atw NA with the J35 with all kinds of modifications yet vq35 unopened except for cams 400hp atw achieved and HR model is already fast enough.
This opens up a reason not to ignore any longer all those cheap pulsars from the late 80s and early 90s as a budget nissan build like we used to get with datsuns.
Nissan pulsar with maxima vq35hr would be a honda killer.
Look at this HR swap in a heavy sedan, the sound and response is magic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRqOoE8HHvc
EDIT* well looks like the VQ is the go to engine for NA applications but the Honda J is the boosted king for stock bottom end designs as is the Toyota MZ and GR motors.
The Honda J can handle 800hp with stock bottom end but the vq 500hp
Quote:Originally Posted by 350VRz View Post Every turbo 350z owner I have met has had a blown motor and some people in Tampa who work and worked at some well-known 350z performance shops have told me this. They said over 600hp they eventually all blow. I will qualify my statement by saying this is just what people tell me. What I have seen, been told and read on this forum and other is where I am forming my opinion. Fixed. You're talking about the validity of your statement, based on what people tell you. You'd quantify the number of owners who have blown there motor (i.e. I will quantify the number of turbo Z owners with blown motors by saying ALL that I have talked to have had an engine failure.)
|
|