Hi guys!
Because I know you guys are pretty down to earth can someone clarify whether you think I have any feet to stand on for a refund. The car had travelled less than 600km since purchase in less than 1 week...
So I purchased a 2009 subaru sti. 40000kms on the clock and immaculate condition inside and outside. I was told by the salesman it had a service just before and everything is mint... So after handing the keys to my missus for a week. After a couple
Of days she notes it's blowing white smoke in the morning before she goes to work. So I get home a couple of days later. I drive it and it stalls. Start it back up and it has check engine light. I take it to subaru specialist and he determines it has a misfire in one cyclinder and most probably broken ring lands... So
I ring the dealer... I ask for it to be returned and they tow the vehicle from my house a couple of days later.... I find out today that the engine has been rebuild previously... Bores still have home marks... Damage to the camshaft not on the lobes on the actual shaft! One cylinder has 60psi compression... The turbo is full of oil along with the manifold.... And it was later found to have bits of metal in the sump...which oil had been passing around the intake etc aswell
My question to you is can I demand a refund or a replacement vehicle of equal value? I would never of bought the car if it had a rebuilt engine.... And I certainly don't want it to be rebuilt again but I more worried about the rest of the drivetrain in this thing :(
I came across this
http://m.carsguide.com.au/news-and-reviews/car-news/lemon_storyIs this true?
Many thanks
Wish I bought another datsun :)