Lobster wrote:
I think the car looks pretty cool actually.

How many of ur cars when taken out on a saturday night, get the picture taken at least 6 times per night and EVERYONE stops n stares at da car and gives it a thumbs up

i dont think many of u hell i even had a chick sit on my mate while i drove it and its a 2 seater lmao

mikali wrote:
hey guys i found a nice website with a 240z crammed with a small block chev very nice colour too http://mr240z.tripod.com

Dodgeman wrote:
Quote:

L18_B110 wrote:
Anyone who sticks....etc.... or auto in a 240Z ....
And why on earth would you put an auto in a sports car?

I assume that the sentiment about the auto trans would also apply to such true classics as the AC Shelby Cobra, yet two were built new with such a trans.
One of them is still owned [i believe] by the original owner, a fellow by the name of Carol Shelby. I was also of the belief that the other was built for Bill Cosby & it ran either twin turbo's or a 427 cammer [or both, I forget]
If an auto is good enough for the father of both the Cobra & the Viper, then it's good enough for me.

When adequate power is available, I don't think an auto is any sort of dissadvantage, & while I think this particular Z is a yawn, I think it qualifies under the heading of 'adequate power'

The Z was a mass produced Datsun, yet we have no reservations about performing similar mechanical changes to our own much loved mass produced Datsuns with the fitment of L series, CA, SR, & FJ engines. [and more] If the Z was a hand built, limited production classic, then I might agree, but it isn't, instead, like our own beloved rides, it's just another car. Is it a classic? Not yet, but eventually when it becomes rare enough.