|
Main Menu
Login
Fast Search Slow Search
Google Ad |
Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
#11
Re: bigger brake's rear?
PIGDOG
Posted on: 2008/12/14 8:25
by bigger im assuming that your just talking about the size of the disc, which wont have much to do with the rear locking up before the fronts
its when the rear calipers are too small (in piston area) compared to the front that they lock up not when they are too big id say they would be fine when using 120y fronts bias wise, but wouldnt suggest keeping 120y brakes if you have the need for a r31 diff anyway
#12
Re: bigger brake's rear?
hotrocket
Posted on: 2008/12/14 8:31
120Y front not maddat rear .....ROCKET rear end....lol
#13
Re: bigger brake's rear?
hotrocket
Posted on: 2008/12/14 8:43
the rear is totally stock R31, the front 120y is temp,
im still trying to understand how to change to skyline fronts to keep them uniformed.......not sure in what strutto use, help be good on that subject
#14
Re: bigger brake's rear?
PIGDOG
Posted on: 2008/12/14 8:53
you dont have to use r31 fronts, pretty much all single piston calipers will keep about the same brake bias
or if you want to get tricky you could measure the r31 front piston size and then can use other single piston calipers that have roughly the same size piston personally i'd choose what sorta struts you want to use then just go with brakes that will fit onto them but if you really want to fit r31 front brakes best way of doing it would be bluebird front struts, shortened to take r31 or 240z inserts with smaller 1200 sized spring perches welded on or coilovers then r31 brakes bolt straight on and you use all the same stuff as stanza struts to bolt them into a 1200, plus a pair of sheer load spacers to properly locate the strut...can get these from datsport but r31 brakes arent that great from a wheel fitment point of veiw they are only a 250ish mm disc with a single piston caliper but you need at least 14s to clear them
#15
Re: bigger brake's rear?
hotrocket
Posted on: 2008/12/14 9:40
thats a great lot of info there mate .....thanks
i have tryed a bit of playing around with r31 strut and put 1200 purches on looks good plenty of clearence for wide tyres, im will be using skyline standard rims for the time being so if i buy a pair of sheer load spacers thats all i need?
#16
Re: bigger brake's rear?
PIGDOG
Posted on: 2008/12/14 9:46
if you have all the stanza struts fitting gear
lcas, balljoints, steering arms and stuff could also just use r31 struts, but then you have positive camber unless you have camber tops adjusted as far in as they car go then you might just get some neg camber, maybe
#17
Re: bigger brake's rear?
hotrocket
Posted on: 2008/12/14 9:52
can the neg camber be used at the x-member, intead at the top!
im not up with tech side of things but im learning
#18
Re: bigger brake's rear?
ROConnor
Posted on: 2008/12/14 9:55
you greatly widen your track if you do that with isent sutch a bad thin for a track car but means a afir bit of body work for road worthy..
#19
Re: bigger brake's rear?
PIGDOG
Posted on: 2008/12/14 10:00
yeah extra track from the strut swap plus extra track to get camber isnt really the best thing for a street car (he says as he thinks " thats exactly whats been done to my street car")
much easier, in the long run, to just use modified bluebird struts r31 struts are only really an advantage if your wanting to run 17s or something like that with a fair positive offset as you have more clearance to the wheel/tyre than you do with bluebird ones
#20
Re: bigger brake's rear?
hotrocket
Posted on: 2008/12/14 10:05
it a bit like stuck between a rock and a hard place on this front end stuff,
You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
|