+ Register
|
Main Menu
Login
Fast Search Slow Search
Google Ad |
Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
#41
Re: JTS v hurricane v Hi-tec Headers
datto1000wagon
Posted on: 2009/2/13 9:55
i would have thought that smaller dia pipe (to an extent) would be better for quiker spool up
 
#42
Re: JTS v hurricane v Hi-tec Headers
reuby_tuesday
Posted on: 2009/2/13 10:04
this is where the witchcraft comes in. The pipe size before the turbo would have to be determined by the size of the inlet of the turbo. Considering how limited in pipe size your are before the turbo (due to space), I woulnt think that this would be a major concern. Sure, consider it, but its the pipe after the turbo that would have the most enginering.
I would also think that the closer to the head the turbo is, the faster the spool up. The size of the exhaust after the turbo is from what I understand should be big as you can fit in there.
#43
Re: JTS v hurricane v Hi-tec Headers
Gary_P
Posted on: 2009/2/13 17:30
Jmac,
Thanks for the great header theory. This is great stuff!
#44
Re: JTS v hurricane v Hi-tec Headers
OldmanAdam
Posted on: 2009/2/14 13:25
![Open in new window](javascript:CaricaFoto("http://datsun1200.com/modules/myalbum/photos/18796.jpg");) i can do it look photo my a15 hurricane extractors
#45
Re: JTS v hurricane v Hi-tec Headers
Dale91
Posted on: 2009/2/14 13:30
how much did you pay for the a15 hurricane extracters?
#46
Re: JTS v hurricane v Hi-tec Headers
OldmanAdam
Posted on: 2009/2/14 13:37
dale about $290Web Link
You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
|
