|
Main Menu
Login
Fast Search Slow Search
Google Ad |
Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
#11
Re: 120Y AMR500/300
A14force
Posted on: 2009/12/31 22:08
probably to eliminate poor fuel economy from parasitic losses?
#12
Re: 120Y AMR500/300
Gordon_Duax
Posted on: 2010/1/2 5:48
Twin-charging was just something that several Japanese manufactures played with.
The supercharger negates turbo lag at lower rpm, and the turbo utilizes wasted energy to provide boost, and relieve supercharger power draw at higher rpm. Toyota also did it on the GX81 Chaser sedan. And HKS made a kit for the 4AG for twin-charging it. Both have to be sized correctly for the engine they are going on, and both would make boost by them selves, without the other, but over all performance would not be as good. In the end, nobody does it any more. I guess because of the cost and complexity of the systems. Nissan only built 500 of the super-turbo March cars per year. I believe it was just to meet production requirements of a class of racing there in Japan. You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
|