User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search
Google Ad



Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users



« 1 (2)


Re: 120Y AMR500/300
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster)
Joined:
2003/12/3 7:56
From Christchurch NZ
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3706
Offline
probably to eliminate poor fuel economy from parasitic losses?

Posted on: 2009/12/31 22:08
_________________
Forced Induction!
Because everyone knows you don't bring a knife to a gunfight!
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: 120Y AMR500/300
Just popping in
Joined:
2009/12/30 19:50
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 2
Offline
Twin-charging was just something that several Japanese manufactures played with.
The supercharger negates turbo lag at lower rpm, and the turbo utilizes wasted energy to provide boost, and relieve supercharger power draw at higher rpm.
Toyota also did it on the GX81 Chaser sedan.
And HKS made a kit for the 4AG for twin-charging it.

Both have to be sized correctly for the engine they are going on, and both would make boost by them selves, without the other,
but over all performance would not be as good.

In the end, nobody does it any more. I guess because of the cost and complexity of the systems.

Nissan only built 500 of the super-turbo March cars per year.
I believe it was just to meet production requirements of a class of racing there in Japan.

Posted on: 2010/1/2 5:48
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer



« 1 (2)



You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]