User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search
Google Ad



Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users



« 1 (2)


#6 Re: HP is not important?
bobthebuilder Posted on: 2009/12/10 8:20
Hi guys

No matter how much torque or horsepower or whatever you put through a diff wouldn't tyre grip be a determining factor.
Once you have got the tyres spinning you can't exert any more force on the drive train ?
Sounds a bit simplistic but so am I
Cheers
bob


#5 Re: HP is not important?
1000Coupe Posted on: 2009/12/10 8:09
hp = rpm x torque anyway, thats why it matters most, its the force behind the punch that does the damage regardless of the speed, if that makes sense.


#4 Re: HP is not important?
Mildman Posted on: 2009/12/10 8:01
What breaks stuff is force, the unit of force in twisting is torque. Horsepower indicates how far up the engines rpm range that torque is made - gives you a good indications of a cars top speed, but not a accurate indication of how much drivetrain breaking force is available.

"The resulting torque fed to the differential is a multiple of the rpm at the motor." - I disagree, the torque value is not multiplied by RPM - it can be constant across the entire RPM range of a vehicle in some cars. Torque is independant of RPM

Have a think about how big diffs are in trucks, these things have very low horsepower motors with phenomenal torque figures...

Smaller scale any diesel engine really, poor HP, good torque.

In F=ma the F is torque the m is mass - so to determine how fast a car accelerates you use torque, then derive the abstract concept of horsepower.

...I think i've forgotten what my original point is... but in summary force breaks stuff and torque is a force.


#3 Re: HP is not important?
PIGDOG Posted on: 2009/12/10 7:45
its still the torque the matters, it would be comparing the 2 different engines with all else being the same. ie same gear ratios so the torque would the multiplied by the same ratio

and its the torque at the diff thats important anyway. so if you had an engine with no torque but a huge reduction ratio then it would possibly need a similar strength diff to an engine with more torque and less of a reduction ratio

horsepower doesnt matter as the diff shouldnt really care what speed its doing when the torque is applied


#2 Re: HP is not important?
datto_mog Posted on: 2009/12/10 7:39
sounds like you know about most of that stuff anyway. I think that the person who made that wiki was thinking along the lines that a 100 lb.ft engine will exert the same strain on the differential in the same gear regardless if it is producing that torque at 2000rpm or 8000rpm.

its the torque that the driveshaft is transferring that is what matters, how fast it is spinning is irrelevant. Perhaps they should have narrowed it down to that rather than engine torque


#1 HP is not important?
crispdollaz Posted on: 2009/12/10 7:23
Hello all,

Firstly, I've come across the Datsun B110 because I'm interested in planning a "hot-rod" project for myself, and this car is about the lightest base frame I can find for that purpose.

I was delighted to find this great site and immediately started looking around at technical stuff. One particular area I am concerned about in my initial concepts for this project is the rear-end of the Datsun. However I found the Tech Wiki, and in that there is a section on rear axles with lots of useful information. In that section there is literature stating that horsepower is not a relevant concern when selecting a differential for a car, but instead crank torque is all that matters.

This does not make sense to me, and I hope to verify my understanding of this with the forum's help. Hopefully I am sufficiently clear.

Here is an example to aid my discussion:

Take two drastically different engines:
1) A X horsepower motor which makes 100 ft lb @ 14,000 rpm.
2) A Y horsepower motor which makes 400 ft lb @ 3,500 rpm.

Both of these engines are coupled to a transmission which is essentially a torque multiplier.

The resulting torque fed to the differential is a multiple of the rpm at the motor. Torque is increased, and rpm is reduced to make it reasonable for driving the wheels of a motor vehicle which typically operate at a lower angular velocities.

If rpm is the variable that affects the multiplication, and horsepower is a product of rpm, torque, and known constants, how is horsepower an irrelevant term when determining the ultimate turning force at a differential?

To further illustrate, realize that the turning force at a differential in a high power drivetrain is in the upper 6,000-12,000 ft lbs. Clearly there is a multiplication of the engine torque.

Some seasoned people may know of this formula:
Torque at
rear axles = Torque x First gear
ratio x Rear gear
ratio x 0.90

Notice that torque is an essential variable in determining the torque at the axle, however this figure is meaningless without factoring the first gear ratio. The first gear ratio effectively cuts horsepower out of the equation, but this ratio is determined by many factors, one of which is the engine rpm, and engine rpm dictates power.

Return to the original example of two engines with X & Y horsepower. Set X=Y=400. Would it be advised to hook a differential sized for a 100 (crank) ft lbs engine to the first, and a differential sized for 400 (crank) ft lbs engine to the second?

It seems that horsepower should be used as a rule of thumb, and formula based on maximum torque and first gear ratio (based on a launch scenario) should be used for a more accurate verdict.



« 1 (2)



You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]