+ Register
|
Main Menu
Login
Fast Search Slow Search
Google Ad |
Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
#21
Re: Cheapest bang for bucks for A12 without engineering
D
Posted on: 2016/8/22 3:44
e dizzie no engineer required but Im keen on the rotary valve head now :)
That saunders RV video haunts me  
#22
Re: Cheapest bang for bucks for A12 without engineering
Mattndew76
Posted on: 2016/8/22 4:01
I'm almost positive you could use a ceramic high RPM ball bearing pack to support two stainless precision ground tube valves with a .0002" slip tolerance.
I want to get a small engine to test this out.
#23
Re: Cheapest bang for bucks for A12 without engineering
ddgonzal
Posted on: 2016/8/22 5:06
Electronic Ignition won't make more power, but it does increase reliability & reduce maintenance. Not sure I'd call it a "bang for your buck"
#24
Re: Cheapest bang for bucks for A12 without engineering
D
Posted on: 2016/8/22 7:27
nother bang for bucks is water inj, just some water into your inlet keeps the carbon deposits away for better overall performance
interesting DD you found 1340cc to be the limit good stuff but to achieve 1338cc most early A12 engines are too old to use 78mm bores but have heard of 77mm yet sleeving is more affordable vs fitting A14 crank, rods, pistons bore honing etc.
You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
|
