User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search
Google Ad



Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





#1 Jumbuck nooooo!!
B120dat Posted on: 2003/2/18 14:18
has anyone seen the new proton jumbuck ute, its a cross bettween the datto ute and brumby..... its got 64kw

but it is killing my datto ute value $ i reckon it will anyway, and people are gonna say "A DATUSN UTE ARENT THEY LIKE THE JUMBUCK"!! they better not say it round me

These new utes will be crawling everywhere soon

Why didnt nissan bring a new release 1200 ute, i could of handled that


#2 Re: Jumbuck nooooo!!
ddgonzal Posted on: 2003/2/18 19:41
autoguide.com.au

Quote:
Small utes are rare beasts in Australia these days
Ya wouldn't know that from all the utes on this site!


#3 Re: Jumbuck nooooo!!
D Posted on: 2003/2/18 23:07
Quote:
guys wanting to move trail bikes, surfboards and the like, even the person looking for a cheap second car for that weekend trip to the tip.

1. My trail bike would not fit on it
2. Surfboards fit perfect on roofracks
3. at 15000 bucks for its ugliness yes that trip sounds right.
p.s. nothing comes close to the 1200 ute well, except for the previous 615kg 1000 ute.


#4 Re: Jumbuck nooooo!!
Lobster Posted on: 2003/2/19 3:13
Open in new window

Looks kinda like a small commodore ute to me.
Don't think it is too ugly. But hey, it is FWD.
Therefore your 1200 ute is greater than it.

It's also heavier than your car. And I think that your car is actually appreciating in value, rather than the depreciating that these will do.


#5 Re: Jumbuck nooooo!!
ddgonzal Posted on: 2003/2/19 3:56
I think they look nice. I was thinking "I wouldn't mind one of those" ... until I got to the part about front-wheel drive.

Ute fever is starting up in the USA. But strangely they are all four-doors: Chevrolet Avalanche, Ford Explorer Sport-Trac, and just this month, the new Subaru Legacy Baja. Oh, and we have no word for them. Are they "trucks"? Are they "cars"? They are not called utes here, and no word has been coined even though they've been made off and on since the '58 Ford Ranchero.


#6 Re: Jumbuck nooooo!!
B120dat Posted on: 2003/2/19 4:29
i dont wanna see em! FWD that suxs!

1200 ute gootta live on


#7 Re: Jumbuck nooooo!!
1200ute8u1 Posted on: 2003/2/19 5:35
Quote:
A DATUSN UTE ARENT THEY LIKE THE JUMBUCK"
no they wont one thing the dato is older every one knows that and it looks nothen like it but i think i no wat u mean by it if they do give them a big speech knocking them off there pedastil


#8 Re: Jumbuck nooooo!!
amshaw Posted on: 2003/2/19 6:17
Sorry fella's but I like 'em. Sometimes I think it would be good to have a more modern little ute, mainly when my "Plain Jane" gives me the ####s.

But for $15,000 au + I will stay with the old girl I guess. As I've seen some 1200 ute's much much worse than mine sold for a heap !! But even if I got $4,000 for for mine I would need to find another $11,000 + on road cost etc. Would be better off spending a bit of cash on Jane.

amshaw


#9 Re: Jumbuck nooooo!!
L18_B110 Posted on: 2003/2/19 7:22
FWD - I prefer to call it wrong wheel drive


#10 Re: Jumbuck nooooo!!
ddgonzal Posted on: 2003/2/19 8:23
$15,000 ... but if you can just fill 'em up down at the billabong, you'd save on petrol costs.



(1) 2 3 »



You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]