+ Register
|
Main Menu
Login
Fast Search Slow Search
Google Ad |
Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
#7
Re: which is harder
dat383
Posted on: 2007/2/5 5:15
mate you can put a chev in one without modifing the firewall.its all the other stuff that makes it hard,steering,suspension,exhaust,cooling.etc...
all of which you have to do if its a ca,sr of even a chev. nothings easy.  
#6
Re: which is harder
ANGE
Posted on: 2007/2/5 4:27
both would be equally as difficult. if anything SR would be harder as there is less
room to work with. both can be done without firewall mods though.
#5
Re: which is harder
Whorida
Posted on: 2007/2/5 3:53
Depends in what way you mean. Both conversions are hard enough, but if I was going SR20 I'd cut the firewall to create room plus have a better weight distribution.
Not sure about QLD, but here in NSW it's nigh on impossible to engineer an SR20DET into a ute.
#4
Re: which is harder
datto1000wagon
Posted on: 2007/2/5 3:01
yea ive seen pics on this site with 1200's that have had the sr20 conversion and havent had the firewall modded and not much room left over though
#3
Re: which is harder
campo
Posted on: 2007/2/5 2:30
thats not what i heard. im pretty sure it can be done without firewall mods. correct me if im wrong
#2
Re: which is harder
crzy_1200_ute
Posted on: 2007/2/5 2:28
sr20 is harder.. u have to cut the firewall
#1
which is harder
campo
Posted on: 2007/2/5 2:20
which would be harder to convert a 1200 ute to?
Sr20det or Ca18det? what requires the most custom work. ect ect.
You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
|
