|
Main Menu
Login
Fast Search Slow Search
Google Ad |
Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
#22
Re: Latest Engineering Problem - Worth a fight???
perthute
Posted on: 2008/2/2 13:01
good one man are you gonna be taking all the perth members for a spin in the ca18det ???????? plz lol lol i am half serious
#21
Re: Latest Engineering Problem - Worth a fight???
old_school
Posted on: 2008/2/2 12:50
Problem fixed. Made a new piece of metal the same shape as the tunnel, goes over the top and down the sides of the tunnel 1 inch, where the old gearstick hole was. MIG welded into place. (Left the old piece there, so did not have to weld over contaminated metal)
Got a friend who has a fabrication shop (who is great with alluminium to) to watch over the process. He's more than happy with my welding and will sign all of the required components off. Only took the afternoon to complete as well. Now need to send the pix to the engineer along with the welding certification. Ready now for the next hurdle.
#20
Re: Latest Engineering Problem - Worth a fight???
lowendtheory
Posted on: 2008/2/1 13:50
are you kidding? don't use a thorough engineer? hmmm. keep the engineers name a secret. I know that when my ute goes for it's inspections that it will most certainly pass 100%, even if it takes 1000 times to go through. I've been in accidents in structurally perfect cars and been lucky to walk away, I'm not going to be taking any risks at all.
#19
Re: Latest Engineering Problem - Worth a fight???
Demo
Posted on: 2008/2/1 9:35
name the engineer
so every1 else dont make the same mistake you did by using him
#18
Re: Latest Engineering Problem - Worth a fight???
edp
Posted on: 2008/2/1 2:03
Thanks for the explanation Burt, I wondered if it was just Gov. regulation at work.
It just seems so labor & time intensive for them to warrant having programs like you guy's are describing that they must be charging plenty of money from the public. At what age of vehicle do they not care if you modify it?
#17
Re: Latest Engineering Problem - Worth a fight???
old_school
Posted on: 2008/1/31 9:26
WHY did I braze it, I asking myself that right now.
The mounts and re-enforcing around the new hole were MIG welded. I think at the time I brazzed the old gear stick hole over coz it seemed easier. I looks neat and you would be hard pressed to tell now it's painted. I can understand why the engineer wants a second opinion regarding the welding certification. Wont have any problems there. The carpets comming out Sat, will cut out the section in question with the plasma and MIG weld a new one in.
#16
Re: Latest Engineering Problem - Worth a fight???
Ronald
Posted on: 2008/1/31 8:47
I wonder why you bothered with brazing it in the first place?
Pop rivets are a bad idea, my uncle told me how he pop riveted a new floor pan into the rear of his old FJ a while ago and got knocked back for it. In my opinion, you can't beat a TIG, however a MIG runs a pretty close second.
#15
Re: Latest Engineering Problem - Worth a fight???
phunkdoktaspok
Posted on: 2008/1/31 5:37
This forum makes me laugh some times.
You laugh at the thought of it being refered to as structual. Well originally it was just a gearstick hole. But its not original anymore is it. Its modified. You take 1 big hole in the tunnel and then you make another big hole down a bit further. Do you truely believe that it is not majorly weakened? Well now its twice as weak as it originally was. Now think about the gearbox mounts. Most people just put it flat on the floor and put metal plates inside to spread the weight. But you went one step further and welded mounts inside the tunnel. Now where in relation to the old gearstick hole is the gearbox mounts. Roughly guessing with the size of the box, i think the new mounts would be under the original gearstick hole or under the new and old gearstick holes. So being the top of the tunnel is weakened from the new and old hole, add the weight of the gearbox loading on the vertical sides of the tunnel, not the floor. Im sure that the structual integrity of the tunnel can easily be debated by the engineer. Im actually suprised the engineer is happy with the new mounts. (are the welds painted?) If the hole is covered by a brased in peice of metal, what tells him the mounts are not brased on too? As for pop rivets - engineers dont like them if they see them. They would prefer the plate be held in by nut and bolt rather than pop rivets.
#14
Re: Latest Engineering Problem - Worth a fight???
bert
Posted on: 2008/1/31 4:37
Australian governments have been screwing the motoring public in general since the mid 70's once they realised the enormous cash cow the motor car can be.
And they are still getting away with putting back bugger all! The voting public will never learn in Aus.
#13
Re: Latest Engineering Problem - Worth a fight???
melburgorbust
Posted on: 2008/1/31 3:41
I gotto agree, it seems odd since it was not structural in the first place, I suppose it could be argued that now that another hole has been cut for the new lever this one has to be filled to replace original strength, but still.
You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
|