|
Main Menu
Login
Fast Search Slow Search
Google Ad |
Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
#21
Re: which cam? tell me your experiences....
levey
Posted on: 2010/4/21 14:02
I had a chat to him, he is new(ish).
As for: "no generalised location specific offence intended", no offence taken! You were quite justified to make the remark "freaking perth spam" by the way. We try to limit our spam/whoring to our own threads now.
#20
Re: which cam? tell me your experiences....
LAGWAGON
Posted on: 2010/4/21 13:54
freaking perth spam
edit: sorry half the valuable responses for this thread have been from perth boys! So no generalised location specific offence intended. just not a fan of useless stuff in useful threads!
#19
Re: which cam? tell me your experiences....
estyre
Posted on: 2010/4/21 13:40
your specs are gay haha !! now you know what your specs are haha
#18
Re: which cam? tell me your experiences....
LAGWAGON
Posted on: 2010/4/21 13:38
so you think taking the lobe separation from 106 to 109 is a good move or leave as is?
#17
Re: which cam? tell me your experiences....
levey
Posted on: 2010/4/21 13:30
I wish I knew what my cam specs are!
#16
Re: which cam? tell me your experiences....
dattoman_1000
Posted on: 2010/4/21 12:29
I've got a Clive 257B
Ask him his advice on that for a streeter :) 104 lob sep 309 thou lift at lobe Exh opens 84 deg closes 59 Inlet opens 56 deg closes 87 261 deg duration
#15
Re: which cam? tell me your experiences....
1200GXman
Posted on: 2010/4/21 11:41
I will be keeping an eye out on this thread. Gonna need some info from you when you have tested your cam that you decide on Lagwagon.
#14
Re: which cam? tell me your experiences....
jmac
Posted on: 2010/4/21 11:11
Teh 140 was a pretty popular grind at one time for mini/bmc a series engines. there are those who will take exception to the 140, on the basis (as applied to minis) that it's got heaps fo duration (a good thing, and you definitely need a bit to get things moving in a higher rpm range) but that (relative to that much duration) the peak lift isn't earth shattering.
I'd make the point in response that for the street, less peak lift means the valvetrain will be under far less stress, slower opening and closing ramps, nice and 'considerate' to the valvetrain, which is a big deal. If it was just for competition use I'd argue the other way, but for this app - not a bad choice at all.
#13
Re: which cam? tell me your experiences....
LAGWAGON
Posted on: 2010/4/21 9:33
beautiful, well a 140 it is! i went down and spoke with clive cams, who used to be one of the brains behind wade and he will grind me up a 140 but with a lobe sep. of more like a 109 than the 106 they usually have to bring some extra low down drivability.
thanks all for your input!
#12
Re: which cam? tell me your experiences....
MY110
Posted on: 2010/4/21 4:43
I've got the 140 in my A15/ Dellortos. It's a street car and is surprisingly good with mid range torque.
Very happy with the cam, I wouldn't go smaller if I were building another motor You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
|