|
Main Menu
Login
Fast Search Slow Search
Google Ad |
Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
#1
2 cylinder A series why not go further?
D
Posted on: 2009/4/8 4:00
Well Ive spent hours searching for the twin cylinder A series
someone chopped up so someone pls help me with the link? Ive been seriously thinking of a super economy engine since for quite sometime now and would like to do an a12 bored to 76mm for a 630cc turbo twin cylinder engine. then I thought of another engine that would be interesting an SD25 diesel with small turbo chopped in halve would make a 1145cc twin and probably around 80hp with the torque of a 2litre. However the pump is the issue and would need careful machining to turn it into a dual unit or maybe a perkins unit could be used? edit: oiling could be an issue also with pickup at rear section but the LD20 ohc diesel is better suited for a 1ltr twin.
#2
Re: 2 cylinder A series why not go further?
DattoFrog
Posted on: 2009/4/8 4:10
I was looking at my friends motor bike the other day. It is a V twin @ 1400cc, 6spd box, shaft drive. It develops more HP and Torque than a stock A12. So why not just drop in a Vulcan and off we go.
#3
Re: 2 cylinder A series why not go further?
ddgonzal
Posted on: 2009/4/8 4:12
It is the infamous A6 Engine
#4
Re: 2 cylinder A series why not go further?
D
Posted on: 2009/4/8 4:21
Pete you are mad
Nah seriously Im in the same boatlooked into a v4 halve chevy 3.2 motor. The Kawa v-twin is so expensive the v4 sesco type motor is cheaper in the end. But the exercise now is an easy to make nissan twinnie in either lpg/turbo or diesel. DD thanxs forgot about the a6 naming quite logical really ![]()
#5
Re: 2 cylinder A series why not go further?
benny
Posted on: 2009/4/8 5:05
Have you considered the subaru sherpa engine, its essentially half a boxer 4. My wife used to drive around in one, years ago, and i remember that we drove it to brisbane and back to sydney on around $85. From memory it was around 550cc and was a crosflow OHC engine. It just kept on going.
edit: I looked it up on the web, advertised engine specs are as follows. Subaru Sherpa / 700 1982 - 1989 Engine: Water-cooled 2-cylinder Capacity: 665 cc Power: 27 kW / 54 Nm Transmission: 4 spd. man Top Speed: 125 km/h
#6
Re: 2 cylinder A series why not go further?
D
Posted on: 2009/4/8 5:34
I used to have a sherpa but the truth is it was no more economical as an a10.
Id like to keep it nissan if possible at worst a 700cc A6 with boost the gearbox mount could be made using the side engine mounts for extra support. A kind of C plate to cover hold the rear main seal and bolt up to the engine mounts, exhaust side of the head and inlet side. I think now on looking at several Diesel engines and the limited info Ive done a backflip and decided the L20B engine with a Ka24e head would be the go. Everything is in the right place with oil pick-up, dizzie and mount on the front section of the block. The Ka24e head has two large inlet valves at 34mm and one fat 40mm exhaust
#7
Re: 2 cylinder A series why not go further?
nick_m
Posted on: 2009/4/8 7:05
Why not just convert one of the ma10 micra engines to rwd, aren't they only a 1000 and turbo from factory?
Or is that too easy? :)
#8
Re: 2 cylinder A series why not go further?
nick_m
Posted on: 2009/4/8 7:08
or even better the ma09ert. From the nissan march superturbo............... That name makes me laugh everytime!
#9
Re: 2 cylinder A series why not go further?
D
Posted on: 2009/4/8 7:31
whats the fun in that?
Nah seriously a simple A6 on boost would do for 70hp and good economy 654cc 76mm bore 70mm stroke The only issue is finding 126mm rods to allow for better rod/stroke ratio of 1.785 or so to smoothen the nervous shaker Does anyone know of any 125mm rods or there abouts? I know toyota 4age rods are 122mm but .5mm wont cut it.
#10
Re: 2 cylinder A series why not go further?
Posted on: 2009/4/8 11:33
but what about torque, cant see a a6 doing much even boosted, i feel that a better built a10 with balancing would do a lot better in bossted form and with the increased torque would be better for economy due to not having to rev the crap out of it up any sort of incline... i know 400cc but still almost double the capacity and on lpg, would be a miser
You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
|