User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search
Google Ad



Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





#1 a14 vs a15
rb20 Posted on: 2006/5/24 4:00
I was thinking about rebuilding my a14 with a stronger botem end, eg. cossworth pistons balenced crank and rods ect,ect.
all for my suberched setup.
The thing i was wondering is will the losse of midrange torque be grately noticable from the a15 or would i be better off taking the car off the road so i can do this to the a15
chears
mick


#2 Re: a14 vs a15
qik1000 Posted on: 2006/5/24 4:08
Apparently, the early A14's have forged cranks. I'm still not sure how to tell without stripping the motor. But this would be the best crank for your application.


#3 Re: a14 vs a15
rb20 Posted on: 2006/5/24 4:12
thanx for the fast response i will keep that in mind


#4 Re: a14 vs a15
Dodgeman Posted on: 2006/5/24 11:10
Quote:

qik1000 wrote:
Apparently, the early A14's have forged cranks.
Correct me if i'm wrong here, but I had thought that they ALL had forged cranks.
I know that they are all pretty bloody good, whatever their construction.


#5 Re: a14 vs a15
WhiteSedan Posted on: 2006/5/24 11:23
I was under the impression both a and l series cranks were forged, but please correct me if im wrong.


#6 Re: a14 vs a15
Freak Posted on: 2006/5/24 11:30
Ive got an A14 and A15 crank in the shed. Both look to be of the same construction and steel.


#7 Re: a14 vs a15
qik1000 Posted on: 2006/5/25 8:16
Ok. now I'm really confused. I'm sure it was you Dodgeman who told me and emailed me a picture showing two A14 cranks. One forged, and the other case. It's definately been on other posts on this site too. But I've always been a little reluctant to believe it myself. Can anyone else clarify this issue please ??!!?!


#8 Re: a14 vs a15
Dodgeman Posted on: 2006/5/25 9:18
There was a member that came on with some pictures of his A14 crank that had been polished, etc. & compared it with another A14 crank that was heavier in construction & weight. This extra weight did not add to the strength, just the weight.
Both cranks were regarded as 'good', but for performance applications, the lighter one was regarded as 'better'
I do not recall if one was cast or not.

EDIT
Ahhh, there they are.

Open in new window
This is a link to that thread.




#9 Re: a14 vs a15
rb20 Posted on: 2006/5/28 4:36
is any one able to answer my first question


#10 Re: a14 vs a15
Mildman Posted on: 2006/5/28 14:28
I thought I'd seen the paragraph in the tech section - directly addressing your question.

What's Better? A14 or A15?
It depends on what you mean by 'better':

* A14 often have better availability, meaning you can find one at an inexpensive price.
* A15 has 7% more capacity than the A14, meaning an automatic power increase in low and mid-range RPMs, all else being equal
* A14 and A15 stock bottom ends can both rev to 8,500 rpm so there's no advantage there.
* Since both use the same cylinder head, there is little top-end power advantage with either engine

So there you go!

Edit: heres the tech section link http://datsun1200.com/modules/nsections/index.php?op=viewarticle&artid=26



(1) 2 3 »



You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]