+ Register
|
Main Menu
Login
Fast Search Slow Search
Google Ad |
Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
#1
60A vs 63A which is best?
webbs1200
Posted on: 2011/9/13 6:10
Between the 60A and 63A which is best behind a high performance A14?
 
#2
Re: 60A vs 63A which is best?
teretonga
Posted on: 2011/9/13 7:17
Both will be fine. Preference for me would be the 63A - stronger gearbox that can handle more torque and you have more ratio options available.
#3
Re: 60A vs 63A which is best?
Posted on: 2011/9/13 7:17
I didn't think they made 63 series for a series?
#4
Re: 60A vs 63A which is best?
webbs1200
Posted on: 2011/9/13 8:44
Not a pretty picture but here is the 63 series trans behind one of my A14 motors
Attach file:  test.jpg (63.29 KB)
#5
Re: 60A vs 63A which is best?
Posted on: 2011/9/13 9:02
Shh I should have read USA- I never seen one here. Check wiki. I would have thought 63 would be better as bigger
#6
Re: 60A vs 63A which is best?
A14force
Posted on: 2011/9/13 9:15
The 63 is a very strong peice of kit.
I abuse mine without mercy. And although the 2nd and third gear synchro's are but a distant memory, I doubt I'll ever be able to break it.
#8
Re: 60A vs 63A which is best?
Posted on: 2011/9/13 10:52
yeah but strength would come into play too greendog. is go for strength if i was hammering it all day.
#9
Re: 60A vs 63A which is best?
Gary_P
Posted on: 2011/9/13 15:46
I prefer the 63A on ratios alone. 1st and 2nd are a little bit taller. This helps close the large gap between 2nd and 3rd that the 60A has. 5th is slightly lower on the 63A also. Makes for a box with nicer gear spacing overall.
The extra strength is nice also.
You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
|
