|
Main Menu
Login
Fast Search Slow Search
Google Ad |
Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
#1
thoughts on this approach re:caster
spatchcock
Posted on: 2012/10/23 1:32
![]() Quote: Lowering a 1200 a lot and keeping the stock length castor arms is like a rough night out with your mates on the booze. You have fun and everything is going great but it gets to a point and you bail/miss judge the fence jump/walk into something you shouldn’t and now you can’t self centre when you’re walking. The problem I found in the past when drifting my truck is that the front edge of the wheel sits really close to the front edge of the wheel arch so instead of just shortening the castor arms to solve my loss of castor, I’m left with the options of either cutting the gaurds and loosing the smooth factor curve or running skinnier wheels (which wasn’t about to happen). beeoneoneoh
#2
Re: thoughts on this approach re:caster
L18_B110
Posted on: 2012/10/23 2:05
#3
Re: thoughts on this approach re:caster
Posted on: 2012/10/23 2:41
You can rotate the camber tops a little more so no need to re drill the holes as piggy and I did (Based on his advice).
#4
Re: thoughts on this approach re:caster
ddgonzal
Posted on: 2012/10/23 5:13
That method increases caster by moving the top of the strut rod aft-ward from the normal "center of the strut top".
Quote: shifted the top of the shock towards the firewall
#5
Re: thoughts on this approach re:caster
Posted on: 2012/10/23 6:05
So does this no drilling. Would've more if I milled the.tops like boofhead haslook here
#6
Re: thoughts on this approach re:caster
L18_B110
Posted on: 2012/10/23 6:57
yeah but that way you get almost no extra static camber.
#7
Re: thoughts on this approach re:caster
Posted on: 2012/10/23 7:19
True it is less camber but still manage about neg 1 camber with Ute ball joints. If I put stanza ones in will be more like neg 2 degrees camber
#8
Re: thoughts on this approach re:caster
jmac
Posted on: 2012/10/23 7:54
Thanks to the approximate length of the strut from ball joint to strut top (and I realise it varies with ride height!) on datsuns, I seem to recall it was very close to 1cm=1 degree of angle. This will work at small angles/changes in distance, which is the limit of what would be achieved here anyway, it certainly won't be accurate when you get out around 10-12 cm difference.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1_in_60_rule It's not dead accurate but handy enough for guaging the approximate changes you might or already have achieved via moving strut tops or control arms or caster bars etc. You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
|