Quote:
1200ute8u1 wrote:
what engine was put in a 1600. was it an L-16. arent L- series motors heavy would it be a good idea to stick a A-15/A-15 in a 1600.
I was all prepared to shoot this argument down. When I checked the facts though, it seems he might be on to something. But only if you are building for torque, and aren't allowed to increase the original engine displacement of the car.
Since the A-15 has a 9mm longer stroke, (82mm vs 73mm) it should produce more torque than the L-16. Not to mention that an overhead valve, pushrod arrangement is (generally) better for torque than an overhead cam.
On the other hand, the bore size is just about as drastic the other direction (A-15=76mm, L-16=83mm). Theory has it that a larger bore shorter stroke engine will make more horsepower since it will spin higher. I won't go into the "myth of horsepower" again though.
So, it seems to me that, on paper, the A-15 could be a better choice than an L-16 in a 1600 (called a 510 here in the states).
Of course, those arguments go right out the window once you notice that L-18s and L-20Bs practically bolt right in to the 1600.
1200ute8u1, good idea in theory. But I think the power advantage of the bigger L-series engines outweighs, pardon the pun, the weight penalty.
It's a small bunny.