LZ20B, 2083cc intercooled Air Research TB05 turbo 5.0:1 comp, 1.5 bar boost

1/2 cut price (small house and land)

weight 137kg

Output 570 ps(419 kw)/7600rpm, Torque 55.0kg/m(398 ft/lb) @ 6400rpm with 1.5kg/cm2.(21 psi) boost

Well,...silverback seems obsessed with rectal references, & what comes from it. Is he trying to tell us something?
Perhaps he could place a dictionary next to his computer, as his spelling tells me that he didn't do so well at school.

Please settle down silverback, as that kind of talk is not appreciated.

I too have not always agreed with 1200RC either, but with well over 2,400 posts, it is obvious that he has been around awhile. I suggest that he deserves your respect, if not your undying affection. [& with all the anal references, i guess he is glad of that.]

Controll your mouth & learn to spell.
Chris
P.S.
Is there something that you are trying to hide? Your member details contain NO INFORMATION about you WHATSOEVER, except for the "Sydney" address. Things that make you go Hmmmm.

.

.

i realise there is a bit of fudge in the weight figures in that regard, but i believe the japanesse figures should be comparable to each other as they would all work relatively the same way, though i would not compare them to other contries (but who else is there really?) [this is just my opinion]

i mean all manufactures are gonna pull the same tricks to make the figures seem smaller [in my opinion]

there is no way to get exact figures other than going and measuring them, and that is not pheasible [in my opinion]

which figures do you doubt???
i mean you didnt complain till i told ya ya precious rotary was a f'n whale [in my opinion]

please dont respond here, as its defeating the purpose of the thread [in my opinion]

How are the all engine weights you quoted weighed. Bare blocks? dry? what?

Maybe you need to do more research on your already quoted figures, cause they aren't giving you much of a comparison at all...read the edit in my earlier post by the way.

Engine 12A
Type non turbo
Type turbo rotary, twin rotor
rotary, twin rotor turbo
Displacement 2 x 573cc (2292cc)
Compression Ratio spec
Power early
Power late
Power turbo
105bhp @ 6000rpm
115bhp @ 0500rpm
specbhp @ 6000rpm (error on site, sorry)
Torque early
Torque late
Torque turbo
106lb ft @4000rpm
112lb ft @4000rpm
speclb ft @4000rpm
early Fueling
late Fueling
carburetor
injection

above specs

Mazda 12A rotary 348 (20) (RX7) (with oil and water)
Mazda 12A rotary 356 (20) (Japanese model turbo, EFI)

engine weight page (US) some good but most crap

the weights (348 + 356) are in pounds
which equates to 157.8 + 161.4 kg

doesnt sound very light to me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ok, so they are not actual figures, sorry....but neither are they opinions, they are plain facts...

I gave you the figures I had, if you didn't want them then don't ask for them.

Here's an idea on the weight - I can lift one into the back of my ute by myself, and I'm not a huge man.

Quote:

Quote:

booo for you

they are the opions i despise!

no seriously, do some reaserch and put the numbers in, its supossed to be a "comparison"

Mazda 12A rotary (1st gen RX7) RWD

165 hp @ 6500 rpm

Cost - $cheap

EDIT: Weight - 160kg (with everything including manifolds, turbo, full of oil, and water)

Strong gearboxes readily available (Series 4)

Plenty of potential

legal - I don't know ?????????