|
|
Browsing this Thread:
1 Anonymous Users
|
|
Datsun attitude? |
|
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster)  
Joined:
2003/12/3 0:49
From Burbank, CA
Group:
Registered Users
|
should the nose be level higher or lower than the back?
my nose is a little lower than the back...
Posted on: 2007/5/19 3:19
|
|
_________________
|||\ 81 KPB310 /|||
|
|
|
Re: Datsun attitude? |
|
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster) 
Joined:
2004/9/4 23:59
From sydney
Group:
Registered Users
|
A bit of rake always looks cool, so I would say front a bit lower than back.
Posted on: 2007/5/19 3:30
|
|
_________________
If it was easy, everyone would do it.
|
|
|
Re: Datsun attitude? |
|
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster) 
Joined:
2005/8/27 15:36
From Townsville, Qld
Group:
Registered Users
|
^^^^agreed, adn depending on how your suspen is set up it combats the way the body rolls during certain things
Posted on: 2007/5/19 3:47
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Datsun attitude? |
|
Just can't stay away  
Joined:
2007/3/9 9:23
From Redmond, OR
Group:
Registered Users
|
I like the front a bit lower than the back.
Remember back in the day when a Surfer had the back of the car about 4ft off the ground? It looked like the front bumper was going to hit the ground. I lived in a Beach town in So. California I saw alot of cars set up that way
Posted on: 2007/5/19 3:55
|
_________________
Here is my motto: I may be getting older but I refuse to grow up 
|
|
|
Re: Datsun attitude? |
|
Home away from home  
Joined:
2007/3/12 20:07
From Canberra
Group:
Registered Users
|
I have to go against the grain here and say I reckon lower in the back looks better. Gives it that drag look.
Posted on: 2007/5/19 5:24
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Datsun attitude? |
|
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster) Joined:
2003/12/3 0:49
From Burbank, CA
Group:
Registered Users
|
Quote: back in the day when a Surfer had the back of the car about 4ft off the ground? It looked like the front bumper was going to hit the ground. I lived in a Beach town in So. California I saw alot of cars set up that way Yeah probably my father and those beach boys if it was around inglewood in the early 60's
Posted on: 2007/5/19 5:35
|
|
_________________
|||\ 81 KPB310 /|||
|
|
|
Re: Datsun attitude? |
|
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster) 
Joined:
2004/5/4 8:32
From Canberra
Group:
Registered Users
|
Quote:
Lachie wrote:
I have to go against the grain here and say I reckon lower in the back looks better. Gives it that lebbo look.
fixed  I prefer slightly higher at the back, with fat rubber
Posted on: 2007/5/19 5:38
|
|
_________________
Recommend trading with: gx5, wardat, dat141, datwags, boofhead, PIGDOG, MYORGZM, sssute, Ronald, beattie, dodgeman, dog160, LAGWAGON, Whitesedan, DamienS, simmos_datto, Team
|
|
|
Re: Datsun attitude? |
|
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster) Joined:
2004/9/4 23:59
From sydney
Group:
Registered Users
|
Quote: I have to go against the grain here and say I reckon lower in the back looks better. Gives it that drag look. Normally drag cars are higher at the back for weight transfer on launch.
Posted on: 2007/5/19 5:42
|
|
_________________
If it was easy, everyone would do it.
|
|
|
Re: Datsun attitude? |
|
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster) 
Joined:
2004/10/28 11:35
From Geelong, Vic
Group:
Registered Users
|
thats why its actually the lebbo look
ill say level for most cars....maybe slightly lower in the front on a 1200 as the guard clearances are all #### when its level
Posted on: 2007/5/19 5:43
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Datsun attitude? |
|
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster) 
Joined:
2005/8/8 9:38
From The garage, NZ
Group:
Registered Users
|
on a 1200.... low as all heck. im not a large fan of hugely high rears and low fronts but low and raked forward is allllll guuud 
Posted on: 2007/5/19 5:45
|
_________________
|
You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.
|
Transfer
