User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search
Google Ad



Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster)
Joined:
2003/6/27 14:53
From Southern Tablelands N.S.W. Australia
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 8287
Offline
Quote:

webbs1200 wrote:
I wonder about replacing the mechanical water pump with an electric water pump. This will greatly increase water flow. Plus now you gain HP.

For a drag racer, running an electric water pump drive off a battery that is not charged from an engine driven altenator will release a few extra HP to the flywheel.

For street use, this is not really a proposition as the coolant flow from this system is constant, so it is likely to be too much at idle, & quite possibly too little at full throttle, particularly when pulling up a long steep hill.
If the coolant flow at low speeds is more than you need, then power is being wasted pushing an excess of coolant around at these lower engine speeds.
In a street car, the power to run the pump is supplied from the altenator, which is in turn, driven by the engine. The higher the electrical load, the higher the mechanical load on the engine. If there was any real advantage to using an electric water pump, then i suspect that the car manufacturers would have done it decades ago.

Posted on: 2004/12/17 4:42
_________________
Love your Datsun.
Treat it well.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Subject Poster Date
     thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle 1200rallycar 2004/12/16 0:12
       Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle 4NIK8 2004/12/16 0:19
         Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle 1200rallycar 2004/12/16 0:24
           Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle 4NIK8 2004/12/16 0:28
         Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle L18_B110 2004/12/16 0:30
           Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle 1200rallycar 2004/12/16 1:07
       Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle webbs1200 2004/12/17 4:19
         Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle Dodgeman 2004/12/17 4:42
           Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle converted 2004/12/17 6:33
             Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle MLS 2004/12/17 7:13
               Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle webbs1200 2004/12/19 22:05
                 Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle WhiteSedan 2004/12/20 10:14
                   Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle Dodgeman 2004/12/20 12:38
                     Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle chowdozer 2004/12/20 14:24
                       Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle MLS 2004/12/21 1:57
                         Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle chowdozer 2004/12/21 3:49
                           Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle chowdozer 2004/12/21 4:01
                         Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle webbs1200 2004/12/21 4:08
                           Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle MLS 2004/12/21 6:15
                             Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle phunkdoktaspok 2004/12/21 10:28
                               Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle MLS 2004/12/21 11:25




You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]