User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search
Google Ad



Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle
Just can't stay away
Joined:
2002/7/25 0:50
From Philadelphia, PA
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 115
Offline
If you go to Summit racing you will see there are different types of electric water pumps. They pump from 20 to 55 gallons per minute.

Once you convert to an electric pump, that draws 6 amps, you decrease the mechanical load on the engine. The altenator does not have to work any harder to create energy then it did before. What happens is less drag on the engine = HP

As to using a oil cooler and custom radiator. That is the way to go. Your racing your car and providing proper cooling to both liquids very important to your engine "oil and water". I know that I am going with the radiator you mentioned. Im already am running a oil cooler from Tomei and the Oberg tattle tail. Im glad to hear it works. As you can see by my pics my radiator is very small. (webbs1200)

Some of the reasons not to use the pump make no sense to me, but the bottom line is that everyone has some very valid points in regards to this subject.

I would say the key to the origanal poster would be find a way to make way for the radiator to receive the proper air flow it needs.

Posted on: 2004/12/19 22:05
_________________
P.T.T.P.

Keep it simple
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Subject Poster Date
     thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle 1200rallycar 2004/12/16 0:12
       Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle 4NIK8 2004/12/16 0:19
         Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle 1200rallycar 2004/12/16 0:24
           Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle 4NIK8 2004/12/16 0:28
         Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle L18_B110 2004/12/16 0:30
           Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle 1200rallycar 2004/12/16 1:07
       Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle webbs1200 2004/12/17 4:19
         Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle Dodgeman 2004/12/17 4:42
           Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle converted 2004/12/17 6:33
             Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle MLS 2004/12/17 7:13
               Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle webbs1200 2004/12/19 22:05
                 Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle WhiteSedan 2004/12/20 10:14
                   Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle Dodgeman 2004/12/20 12:38
                     Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle chowdozer 2004/12/20 14:24
                       Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle MLS 2004/12/21 1:57
                         Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle chowdozer 2004/12/21 3:49
                           Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle chowdozer 2004/12/21 4:01
                         Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle webbs1200 2004/12/21 4:08
                           Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle MLS 2004/12/21 6:15
                             Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle phunkdoktaspok 2004/12/21 10:28
                               Re: thermo vs. mechanical fan at idle MLS 2004/12/21 11:25




You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]