User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Main Menu
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search

Advanced Search
Google Ad

Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





LAGWAGON
Re: What would be quicker?
#1
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster)
Joined:
2004/4/15 3:25
From Melbourne Vic
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1664
Offline
i have raced in a standard VS HSV senator with 6 spd manual and a 205kw (standard) motor. got a best of 14.7.

i raced my datto 1600 with a bog stock no extra boost and a slipping clutch CA18det and ran a best of 14.3

i've heard of 1200's with standard ca's dipping into the thirteen's, my wagon with a few bolt ons and a bit of boost ran a 12.6 with three goes needed to get into fourth gear.

i would bet both my testicles AND my first and second born on the datto!

Posted on: 2006/5/28 13:11
_________________
CA18DET 1200 lagwagon retired
LAG510 - SR20DET 1600 sedan
1000 wagon daily - A series magic
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Subject Poster Date
     What would be quicker? 2SLO 2006/5/28 9:54
       Re: What would be quicker? BAD310 2006/5/28 9:57
         Re: What would be quicker? B120dat 2006/5/28 10:00
           Re: What would be quicker? 2SLO 2006/5/28 10:04
             Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/28 10:41
               Re: What would be quicker? 12OOU 2006/5/28 12:37
                 Re: What would be quicker? Turboute 2006/5/28 12:53
                   Re: What would be quicker? ANGE 2006/5/28 12:57
                     Re: What would be quicker? LAGWAGON 2006/5/28 13:11
                       Re: What would be quicker? 2QK4U 2006/5/28 13:24
                         Re: What would be quicker? Daveman 2006/5/28 13:28
                           Re: What would be quicker? 2QK4U 2006/5/28 13:29
       Re: What would be quicker? carjunkie 2006/5/28 13:30
         Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/28 14:04
           Re: What would be quicker? carjunkie 2006/5/28 14:25
             Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/28 14:40
               Re: What would be quicker? carjunkie 2006/5/28 14:50
                 Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/28 15:03
                   Re: What would be quicker? killer1200 2006/5/28 22:00
                     Re: What would be quicker? 2SLO 2006/5/29 9:02
                       Re: What would be quicker? rb20 2006/5/29 9:33
                       Re: What would be quicker? sidedraught 2006/5/29 9:58
                         Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/29 10:08
                           Re: What would be quicker? mely 2006/5/29 10:32
                       Re: What would be quicker? 2QK4U 2006/5/29 10:46
       Re: What would be quicker? works1200 2006/5/31 0:43




You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]