User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Main Menu
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search

Advanced Search
Google Ad

Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





carjunkie
Re: What would be quicker?
#1
Home away from home
Joined:
2006/5/11 1:54
From brisbane, qld
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 487
Offline
Datto 4 sure! Holden 'fans' will disagree,but most standard efi 304's are slugs! So much weight to push around. A worked a15 will give them a good run if not beat them, so the CA will kick ass.

Posted on: 2006/5/28 13:30
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Subject Poster Date
     What would be quicker? 2SLO 2006/5/28 9:54
       Re: What would be quicker? BAD310 2006/5/28 9:57
         Re: What would be quicker? B120dat 2006/5/28 10:00
           Re: What would be quicker? 2SLO 2006/5/28 10:04
             Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/28 10:41
               Re: What would be quicker? 12OOU 2006/5/28 12:37
                 Re: What would be quicker? Turboute 2006/5/28 12:53
                   Re: What would be quicker? ANGE 2006/5/28 12:57
                     Re: What would be quicker? LAGWAGON 2006/5/28 13:11
                       Re: What would be quicker? 2QK4U 2006/5/28 13:24
                         Re: What would be quicker? Daveman 2006/5/28 13:28
                           Re: What would be quicker? 2QK4U 2006/5/28 13:29
       Re: What would be quicker? carjunkie 2006/5/28 13:30
         Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/28 14:04
           Re: What would be quicker? carjunkie 2006/5/28 14:25
             Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/28 14:40
               Re: What would be quicker? carjunkie 2006/5/28 14:50
                 Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/28 15:03
                   Re: What would be quicker? killer1200 2006/5/28 22:00
                     Re: What would be quicker? 2SLO 2006/5/29 9:02
                       Re: What would be quicker? rb20 2006/5/29 9:33
                       Re: What would be quicker? sidedraught 2006/5/29 9:58
                         Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/29 10:08
                           Re: What would be quicker? mely 2006/5/29 10:32
                       Re: What would be quicker? 2QK4U 2006/5/29 10:46
       Re: What would be quicker? works1200 2006/5/31 0:43




You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]