User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Main Menu
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search

Advanced Search
Google Ad

Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





Mildman
Re: What would be quicker?
#1
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster)
Joined:
2003/9/2 6:01
From SE Melbourne
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3195
Offline
Same can be said about the new Ford V8's, with no torque till around 4400 rpm they are worse than a laggy turbo. (But I'm biased liking both Datsuns and turbos).

Posted on: 2006/5/28 14:04
_________________
Mildman, Datsunless
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Subject Poster Date
     What would be quicker? 2SLO 2006/5/28 9:54
       Re: What would be quicker? BAD310 2006/5/28 9:57
         Re: What would be quicker? B120dat 2006/5/28 10:00
           Re: What would be quicker? 2SLO 2006/5/28 10:04
             Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/28 10:41
               Re: What would be quicker? 12OOU 2006/5/28 12:37
                 Re: What would be quicker? Turboute 2006/5/28 12:53
                   Re: What would be quicker? ANGE 2006/5/28 12:57
                     Re: What would be quicker? LAGWAGON 2006/5/28 13:11
                       Re: What would be quicker? 2QK4U 2006/5/28 13:24
                         Re: What would be quicker? Daveman 2006/5/28 13:28
                           Re: What would be quicker? 2QK4U 2006/5/28 13:29
       Re: What would be quicker? carjunkie 2006/5/28 13:30
         Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/28 14:04
           Re: What would be quicker? carjunkie 2006/5/28 14:25
             Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/28 14:40
               Re: What would be quicker? carjunkie 2006/5/28 14:50
                 Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/28 15:03
                   Re: What would be quicker? killer1200 2006/5/28 22:00
                     Re: What would be quicker? 2SLO 2006/5/29 9:02
                       Re: What would be quicker? rb20 2006/5/29 9:33
                       Re: What would be quicker? sidedraught 2006/5/29 9:58
                         Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/29 10:08
                           Re: What would be quicker? mely 2006/5/29 10:32
                       Re: What would be quicker? 2QK4U 2006/5/29 10:46
       Re: What would be quicker? works1200 2006/5/31 0:43




You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]