User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search
Google Ad



Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





Re: What would be quicker?
Home away from home
Joined:
2005/4/19 6:10
From Gold Coast, Australia
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 744
Offline
10,000+ is what it has cost my brother for SR20 turbo.

for me i plan on putting an NA SR20 in my ute for around 2000-2500 excluding motor and box which will cost me $1500

Cross memebrs for SR20 engine 350, electrical 450, drive shaft --, thermo fan --, sway bar 250, hydrolic clutch $100, fuel tank with electic pump 200, fuel lines 80, exhaust - ill get done next to nothing,

other wise i have a radiator from the front cut and same thing with plenty of other parts. then its battery lines, filter etc ect. very budget conversion with no frills for now. I know i could have missed somethings - remind me if i have.

Na engine theres no big 3 inch mandrel exhaust and pricey plumbing to include or intercooler. i dont have to replace my diff, my brakes are sufficeint temporarily.

Posted on: 2006/5/29 10:46
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Subject Poster Date
     What would be quicker? 2SLO 2006/5/28 9:54
       Re: What would be quicker? BAD310 2006/5/28 9:57
         Re: What would be quicker? B120dat 2006/5/28 10:00
           Re: What would be quicker? 2SLO 2006/5/28 10:04
             Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/28 10:41
               Re: What would be quicker? 12OOU 2006/5/28 12:37
                 Re: What would be quicker? Turboute 2006/5/28 12:53
                   Re: What would be quicker? ANGE 2006/5/28 12:57
                     Re: What would be quicker? LAGWAGON 2006/5/28 13:11
                       Re: What would be quicker? 2QK4U 2006/5/28 13:24
                         Re: What would be quicker? Daveman 2006/5/28 13:28
                           Re: What would be quicker? 2QK4U 2006/5/28 13:29
       Re: What would be quicker? carjunkie 2006/5/28 13:30
         Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/28 14:04
           Re: What would be quicker? carjunkie 2006/5/28 14:25
             Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/28 14:40
               Re: What would be quicker? carjunkie 2006/5/28 14:50
                 Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/28 15:03
                   Re: What would be quicker? killer1200 2006/5/28 22:00
                     Re: What would be quicker? 2SLO 2006/5/29 9:02
                       Re: What would be quicker? rb20 2006/5/29 9:33
                       Re: What would be quicker? sidedraught 2006/5/29 9:58
                         Re: What would be quicker? Mildman 2006/5/29 10:08
                           Re: What would be quicker? mely 2006/5/29 10:32
                       Re: What would be quicker? 2QK4U 2006/5/29 10:46
       Re: What would be quicker? works1200 2006/5/31 0:43




You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]