User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search
Google Ad



Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





Re: carbon or compression?
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster)
Joined:
2003/6/27 14:53
From Southern Tablelands N.S.W. Australia
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 8287
Offline
Quote:

Ronald wrote:
try fiddling with your timing a bit more. try it at like 10deg btdc and then at 15 and see if that helps.
So with the timing set at an 'indicated' 5 degrees retarded, it didn't ping. At TDC, it pings when it's hot. At 5 degrees advance, it pings a lot, so it looks like we have a pattern here & I would recomend against setting it at 10 & 15 degrees advance as it doesn't take Einstein to figure out the probable result.

Dattodevil is correct, so lets get back to basics. How do you know that the piston is actually at TDC when the timing mark lines up. Best to pull the plugs & slip a cane chopstick down number 1 plug hole & turn the crank very slowly with a long bar & socket while holding the chopstick gently in your fingers.
You will soon get to figure out when the piston is at TDC. This is not 100% accurate of course, but do your best, & if the mark is way off, then that could be a problem & a small dab of white paint to make a new TDC mark would be a good idea.
If the existing mark is accurate, then it's time to look for other causes, but make sure that this is right first.

The default position for the vacuum canister is in the non-advance position & it only advances when you are at light throttle, so at worst, it will remain in the 'at-rest' position & not provide any vacuum advance at all, even when faulty.

Posted on: 2006/6/7 16:26
_________________
Love your Datsun.
Treat it well.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Subject Poster Date
     carbon or compression? Losadel 2006/6/7 9:59
       Re: carbon or compression? Ronald 2006/6/7 10:37
         Re: carbon or compression? 1200GXman 2006/6/7 11:02
           Re: carbon or compression? dattodevil 2006/6/7 11:44
             Re: carbon or compression? Losadel 2006/6/7 13:00
               Re: carbon or compression? 1200GXman 2006/6/7 13:32
         Re: carbon or compression? Dodgeman 2006/6/7 16:26
           Re: carbon or compression? Losadel 2006/6/8 13:39
             Re: carbon or compression? 1200GXman 2006/6/8 14:43
           Re: carbon or compression? Ronald 2006/6/9 7:49




You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]