User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Main Menu
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search

Advanced Search
Google Ad

Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





Ronald
Re: carbon or compression?
#1
Home away from home
Joined:
2005/12/7 4:37
From Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 781
Offline
Quote:

Dodgeman wrote:
it doesn't take Einstein to figure out the probable result.


Einstein is dead. I'm pretty sure he wouldn't feel up to playing "find out whats wrong with the engine" today.

plus i only SUGGESTED he try the timing at different advances. and if he did discover what you suggested and that it would knock more, at least we know for sure. can't be sure until you've tried it....




Posted on: 2006/6/9 7:49
_________________
"Like a Rolling Stone"
Bob Dylan

New Daily: <<<<Now For Sale.
1972 B110, 13" Bathurst mags, airbrus
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Subject Poster Date
     carbon or compression? Losadel 2006/6/7 9:59
       Re: carbon or compression? Ronald 2006/6/7 10:37
         Re: carbon or compression? 1200GXman 2006/6/7 11:02
           Re: carbon or compression? dattodevil 2006/6/7 11:44
             Re: carbon or compression? Losadel 2006/6/7 13:00
               Re: carbon or compression? 1200GXman 2006/6/7 13:32
         Re: carbon or compression? Dodgeman 2006/6/7 16:26
           Re: carbon or compression? Losadel 2006/6/8 13:39
             Re: carbon or compression? 1200GXman 2006/6/8 14:43
           Re: carbon or compression? Ronald 2006/6/9 7:49




You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]