User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Main Menu
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search

Advanced Search
Google Ad

Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





dattodude
Re: SR20DE or CA18DET fuel economy
#1
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster)
Joined:
1998/12/6 1:08
From Sydney, Australia
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 5806
Offline
high 7Litres/100kms for sr20det, and low 8L/100kms for ca18det.

I drove Sydney to Melbourne on 270mmx9.25 cams and still got 10L/100kms with my CA18det.

A ca18de gets better fuel economy than an A12.

Posted on: 2008/6/13 13:47
_________________
'71 Green 1200 Sedan CA18DET Project 99.98% complete
'71 White 1200 Sedan 20,000mi + A14T (twin 40DCOE 30/70 cam, extractors)
Website: http://www.shoeys.com
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Subject Poster Date
     SR20DE or CA18DET fuel economy grayhood 2008/6/13 10:05
       Re: SR20DE or CA18DET fuel economy mattdatca18 2008/6/13 10:48
         Re: SR20DE or CA18DET fuel economy Mildman 2008/6/13 13:04
       Re: SR20DE or CA18DET fuel economy dattodude 2008/6/13 13:47
         Re: SR20DE or CA18DET fuel economy Mildman 2008/6/13 13:49
           Re: SR20DE or CA18DET fuel economy matty 2008/6/13 15:17
             Re: SR20DE or CA18DET fuel economy sooty_grunter 2008/6/16 9:31
         Re: SR20DE or CA18DET fuel economy lukeADE 2008/6/16 12:05
           Re: SR20DE or CA18DET fuel economy dattodude 2008/6/16 13:19




You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]