User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search
Google Ad



Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





Why non-stock LCAs?
Moderator
Joined:
2001/5/3 7:04
From 48 North
Group:
Registered Users
Contentmaster
Usermaster
Posts: 31599
Offline
With Datsun 1200 LCAs (lower control arms), you can bolt on B310/A10 ball joints. Then most Datsun-Nissan struts bolt right on (Stanza, 280ZX, etc).

Open in new window


So why would you use anything else? Why swap the LCAs for some other model (e.g Stanza LCA or R31 LCA)?

As far as I can tell, the B110 B310 LCA are identical:
Open in new window

NOTE: Voilet/Stanza A10 LCA and Sunny B310 LCA have the same part number, which was also used by the 1985-up Sunny Truck. They certainly look identical B110, B210, B310/Stanza.

With the B310/Stanza ball joints, it lengthens the track a bit, gaining more negative camber.
Open in new window

Posted on: 2011/8/13 0:05
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Subject Poster Date
     Why non-stock LCAs? ddgonzal 2011/8/13 0:05
       Re: Why non-stock LCAs? dattodude 2011/8/13 0:15
       Re: Why non-stock LCAs? DatsAndy 2011/8/13 2:15
         Re: Why non-stock LCAs? ddgonzal 2011/8/13 2:55
       Re: Why non-stock LCAs? DatsAndy 2011/8/13 3:19
         Re: Why non-stock LCAs? ddgonzal 2011/8/13 6:57
       Re: Why non-stock LCAs? A14force 2011/8/13 23:13
         Re: Why non-stock LCAs? ddgonzal 2011/8/13 23:34




You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]