User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search
Google Ad



Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





Re: Why non-stock LCAs?
Moderator
Joined:
2001/5/3 7:04
From 48 North
Group:
Registered Users
Contentmaster
Usermaster
Posts: 31599
Offline
Thanks. I've been looking through the parts catalogs, and it seems there are only two LCA for all B110, B120, B210, and B310:

Early LCA -- 1970-1975
Late LCA -- 1976 and up, bolts: M10 x 1.25

* All LCA use the same bushing 1970-1982
* Ball joints are different for the two types

Additionally, they used two different ball joints for the late type LCA:
Ball joint: H7400
Ball joint: W5000

B310 Sunny came with either type. B210 & Late 1200 ute (up to 1994) only used the older style.

As usual, USA B210s are different (they used the L14/L16 PB210 suspension including LCA, bushing and Ball Joint).

Posted on: 2011/8/13 6:57
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Subject Poster Date
     Why non-stock LCAs? ddgonzal 2011/8/13 0:05
       Re: Why non-stock LCAs? dattodude 2011/8/13 0:15
       Re: Why non-stock LCAs? DatsAndy 2011/8/13 2:15
         Re: Why non-stock LCAs? ddgonzal 2011/8/13 2:55
       Re: Why non-stock LCAs? DatsAndy 2011/8/13 3:19
         Re: Why non-stock LCAs? ddgonzal 2011/8/13 6:57
       Re: Why non-stock LCAs? A14force 2011/8/13 23:13
         Re: Why non-stock LCAs? ddgonzal 2011/8/13 23:34




You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]