User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search
Google Ad



Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





Re: Why non-stock LCAs?
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster)
Joined:
2003/12/3 7:56
From Christchurch NZ
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 3706
Offline
Quite correct. The later stuff uses the 10mm boilts, verses the 8mm early stuff. They also used a different castor rod too.
When swapping the later LCA (with longer ball joint) either the 1200 ute, (or possibly early b310?) steering arms need to be used too. (The longer B310 ball joint uses a larger taper than the early stuff)
I wonder if the SWB and LWB utes use the same steering arm? (In theory they wouldn't, if they were to maintain optimum ackerman angles)

Posted on: 2011/8/13 23:13
_________________
Forced Induction!
Because everyone knows you don't bring a knife to a gunfight!
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Subject Poster Date
     Why non-stock LCAs? ddgonzal 2011/8/13 0:05
       Re: Why non-stock LCAs? dattodude 2011/8/13 0:15
       Re: Why non-stock LCAs? DatsAndy 2011/8/13 2:15
         Re: Why non-stock LCAs? ddgonzal 2011/8/13 2:55
       Re: Why non-stock LCAs? DatsAndy 2011/8/13 3:19
         Re: Why non-stock LCAs? ddgonzal 2011/8/13 6:57
       Re: Why non-stock LCAs? A14force 2011/8/13 23:13
         Re: Why non-stock LCAs? ddgonzal 2011/8/13 23:34




You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]