User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search
Google Ad



Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





Re: SU vs Weber 32/36 carbs
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster)
Joined:
2008/10/10 22:02
From Melbourne Australia (and likely under the car)
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 1021
Offline
The twin SUs will tend to have a sligtly wider powerband/useful rpm range, and (properly eetup/specced to suit the motor) better throttle response, so the actual performance advantage is higher than any peak power number difference might suggest.

Posted on: 2012/3/27 11:00
_________________
John McKenzie
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Subject Poster Date
     SU vs Weber 32/36 carbs AgentWright007 2012/3/26 15:59
       Re: SU vs Weber 32/36 carbs bakat 2012/3/26 17:42
       Re: SU vs Weber 32/36 carbs AgentWright007 2012/3/26 18:22
       Re: SU vs Weber 32/36 carbs bakat 2012/3/26 19:29
         Re: SU vs Weber 32/36 carbs AgentWright007 2012/3/26 19:32
       Re: SU vs Weber 32/36 carbs bakat 2012/3/26 19:37
         Re: SU vs Weber 32/36 carbs AgentWright007 2012/3/26 19:53
       Re: SU vs Weber 32/36 carbs bakat 2012/3/27 0:31
       Re: SU vs Weber 32/36 carbs jeffroj 2012/3/27 5:54
       Re: SU vs Weber 32/36 carbs bakat 2012/3/27 6:47
       Re: SU vs Weber 32/36 carbs jmac 2012/3/27 11:00
       Re: SU vs Weber 32/36 carbs AgentWright007 2012/3/28 19:03




You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]