User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Main Menu
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search

Advanced Search
Google Ad

Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





ddgonzal
Re: fuel leak
#1
Moderator
Joined:
2001/5/3 7:04
From 48 North
Group:
Registered Users
Contentmaster
Usermaster
Posts: 31599
Offline
OK, found this:

The return line has a smaller hole than the fuel inlet line, so don't get them mixed up! Most Webers do not have provision for a return line, as the 32/36 does not need it. Keep the fuel pressure to the Weber-specified and you won't need it either. It is only used in emission-controlled versions.

Open in new window

Posted on: 2013/2/22 8:27
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer

Subject Poster Date
     fuel leak ShtGnJkr92 2013/2/21 11:11
       Re: fuel leak Anonymous 2013/2/21 11:27
         Re: fuel leak ddgonzal 2013/2/21 22:11
           Re: fuel leak ddiesel 2013/2/22 1:40
       Re: fuel leak ShtGnJkr92 2013/2/22 5:19
         Re: fuel leak Anonymous 2013/2/22 5:43
           Re: fuel leak ddgonzal 2013/2/22 7:13
             Re: fuel leak ddgonzal 2013/2/22 8:27
             Re: fuel leak ShtGnJkr92 2013/2/22 8:43
               Re: fuel leak ddgonzal 2013/2/22 8:58
                 Re: fuel leak ddiesel 2013/2/23 1:59
       Re: fuel leak ShtGnJkr92 2013/2/26 6:08
         Re: fuel leak ddgonzal 2013/2/26 7:12
       Re: fuel leak ShtGnJkr92 2013/3/3 22:14
         Re: fuel leak ddgonzal 2013/3/3 23:42
       Re: fuel leak ShtGnJkr92 2013/3/8 14:49




You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]