I'd be very dubvious of the figures a12grunt posted of more power at much lower revs. Just doesn't stack up. That equates to 109.6lb-ft at peak power - and the peak torque would be higher again. It's simply not realistic to think they found a way to make ~20% more torque than the others. A mistake in the quoted rpm is the most likely problem.
Posted on: 2013/10/28 1:10
Edited by L18_B110 on 2013/10/28 3:57:05
_________________
"if you're not on the edge, you're just taking up space"
Transfer
