No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster) 
Joined: 2008/10/10 22:02
From Melbourne Australia (and likely under the car)
Group:
Registered Users
|
If it's setup to make that sort of power NA, then apart from the compression ratio, the cam will have too much overlap (and likely too much duration) to be ideal as well. In very very very generalised terms, a cam that might make power up to (for example) 6500rpm, and run quickest with gearshifts at 6500rpm on a non turbo setup, might end up seeing the powerband extended to the point you are shifting at 7500rpm or so (possibly even more) assuming there's no other spanner in the works (like a restrictive turbo itself limiting flow beyond a certain point).
Aside from the compression, a well ported head for a turbo setup can differ a little bit, but yours would still (in all likelihood) work very well (flow wise). BUT one thing you would see dramatically different is that the exhaust valve to seat contact area (the thickness of where the two 45 degree angled sections of each actually touch when the valve is closed) for an NA engine is (relatively) thinner for improved flow, but a turbo engine needs thicker seat contact areas, because of the extra heat (not just because the turbo will trap more exhaust flow/heat than a set of extractors would, but also because under boost conditions, more air/fuel is being forced in in the first place, so there's more heat energy to deal with.
So even if you avoided detonation by running a decompression plate or dished pistons or whatever, and you went to a milder cam, you'll still likely run into issues with either the exhaust valves burning out prematurely, or even if that doesn't happen, the exhaust valve wouldn't be able to 'cool' on the seat, as the thinner seats don't transfer as much heat as quickly, so the exhaust valve runs hotter and hotter, and you end up with it causing pre-ignition, or possibly detonation. Either of which isn't a good thing naturally enough.
It might well be that the exhaust seats in question haven't been radically re-worked and aren't too thin for a turbo, but given you mention it's making about 150bhp, it's probably a good bet that they are too thin.
I'm guessing it's running webers or dellortos? They can be made to run blowthrough, but do need some tweaking to get the a/f curve right under boost whilst still being ok off boost. For a drag car, nobody would care if it was poor off boost with high fuel consumption etc, but for any other application, it will take some work.
I don't know if the page is still up (it's been some years since I've looked) but there was a bloke on the old mini-list and also the blowthruturbo list (which has more or less been dead for some years, and was renamed carbureted blowers) by the name of Jukka Harkola (iirc) - he had a turbo mini, and went from the mg metro blowthrough hif44 SU to a 45dhla (I think) dellorto. He spent ages getting it right, and no emulsion tube worked really well, despite massive development, and he ended up having to run restrictor plates at the carb mouths which didn't affect off boost fuel metering, but at high flow/boost, the slight restriction helped it richen up for full power, whilst still maintaining other settings which gave it good all round driveability etc)
Anyway point being, (if it does have webers or dellortos) they aren't the easiest carb in the world to fine tune for a blowthrough setup.
About the only option that comes to mind, is that you might be able to run e85 (if you can get it where you are posting from) and that might have high enough octane to run close to the current compression ratio but still allow 'some' boost safely.
Posted on: 2012/5/24 11:24
|