[< Previous 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 Next >]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a5b9/0a5b9aa2f872567f3a3ddb2c4074d785e7f05908" alt="68 HP 68 HP"
68 HPdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef2b3/ef2b388097d83958a0091d3d7d9f492160854d90" alt="Popular Popular"
ddgonzal 2007/3/10 5:25 Tell a friend
2553 2 0.00 (0 votes)
chassis plate, 1972 USA model |
|
|
[< Previous 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 Next >]
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Poster |
Thread |
DatsunSSS |
Posted: 2007/11/10 17:09 Updated: 2007/11/10 17:09 |
Home away from home data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bd33/3bd33c327327a531dd8b4f96da6f49b722d50b16" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1aca0/1aca05c75f4b58095d035be68db37cf666440f00" alt="" Joined: 2003/2/14 From: Portugal Posts: 472 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d05a/8d05aa31614a34f46cca6523ab70758d7acaec39" alt="" Re: 68 HP Why they didnt use the 69 instead?
|
|
|
|
Poster |
Thread |
ddgonzal |
Posted: 2007/11/10 18:27 Updated: 2007/11/10 18:27 |
Moderator data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc4a7/cc4a7e18c35ef404616d1e71bffa62936723aab0" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7d17/d7d17fba3c7eb5043692f478779fad1550d34133" alt="" Joined: 2001/5/3 From: 48 North Posts: 31658 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d05a/8d05aa31614a34f46cca6523ab70758d7acaec39" alt="" Re: 68 HP More accurate measuring for 1972. For 1971, it read 69 HP. For more details, see Club wiki: Performance
|
|
|
|