[< Previous 2710 2711 2712 2713 2714 2715 2716 Next >]
[< Previous 2710 2711 2712 2713 2714 2715 2716 Next >]
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Poster |
Thread |
AlcoholicA |
Posted: 2004/1/9 16:14 Updated: 2004/1/9 16:14 |
Just can't stay away   Joined: 2002/10/23 From: Australia, SA, Adelaide Posts: 124 |
 Re: Dimlight Racing UM1 it'sretty ugly but it seems like it'd flow well...it's about as ugly as a Cheeseburger from Mc Donalds
|
|
|
Poster |
Thread |
go_the_datto |
Posted: 2002/9/4 13:03 Updated: 2002/9/4 13:03 |
Home away from home   Joined: 2002/5/3 From: Kyabram vic, aust, Posts: 273 |
 Re: Dimlight Racing UM1 looks like it's going to flow well. they are a fair size runners
|
|
|
|
Poster |
Thread |
dimlight65 |
Posted: 2002/9/4 14:13 Updated: 2002/9/4 14:13 |
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster)   Joined: 2001/2/7 From: Fort Worth, Texas, USA Posts: 1003 |
 Re: Dimlight Racing UM1 Pooibly a bit too big to tell the truth. We'll see.
|
|
|
|
|
Poster |
Thread |
ddgonzal |
Posted: 2002/9/6 2:15 Updated: 2002/9/6 2:15 |
Moderator   Joined: 2001/5/3 From: 48 North Posts: 31682 |
 Re: Dimlight Racing UM1 The fabricated runners should probably (optimally) be around the same size as the intake ports to maintain good flow throughout the runner length. The short length should be good for high-rpm power.
All the manifolds I've seen (stock or racing parts) have a large log section. I wonder if that helps with distribution to the cylinders? A small manifold might feed the first cylinder more air than the last ... might be worthwhile to use EGT sensors on each exhaust port to check.
|
|
|
|