User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search
Google Ad



Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users



« 1 2 (3)


Re: Holy crap, now it's Japans turn!
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster)
Joined:
2002/10/28 6:49
From under the Firmament LOL no twiglight effect BS
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 10994
Offline
This itself is a big problem when playing with U-235 and plutonium

"Decisions have been made based on the opinion of the more optimistic seismologist and the opinions of the pessimistic ones are ignored."

The optimistic ones are on the Nuclear Energy payroll.

Posted on: 2011/3/22 9:40
_________________
"Australia" is formed by all its geographically listed territories "including" Norfolk, Christmas & Cocos Islands. The word include excludes all else before it therefore you have no legal rights.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: Holy crap, now it's Japans turn!
Guest_
Quote:

ddgonzal wrote:
is nothing new. plants are designed and operated to manage risk. That's another way of saying the aren't designed or operated to handle the known dangers, only to meet a certain bar and hopefully the bar is high enough. In this case, they lost the bet that a 9.0 earthquake wouldn't cause the problems that were predicted

The san diego plant (right on the ocean and near the big fault line) is being reevaluated. Their cooling batteries are only 8 hour while fukushima were 12 hour, but the plant spokesman says not to worry they have backup generators they can move in should the need arise...


of course it wasnt predicted but we are talking about 20year old technology that is outdated (was almost outdated when installed).

its no supprise that they may have gne with lowest cost- thats what business does. and by saying why go with best case not worse case is not any new argument or highlighting anything anybody knows about global economies of scale... its all down to $$$.

No body can predict an earthquake to its magnitude, just a rough geographical location highlighted by fault lines.

at the end of the day, when the earthquake causes the ground to liquidfy, no human engenieering will withstand it when it built to contain this type of material that is very tempremental and requires specific handleing and cooling conditions.

Its not the earthquake as such that cuased the damage to the cores, it was the loss of power and the time its taken to bring back the cooling funstions, which after said 12 to 24 hours , is too late.

so why banter on about it, we know nuclear is not the future it was once promsised to be. but when a company builds a pant for power that is based around return of investment for profit over a 50 year time frame, and 20years in when its just starting to make its long term returns, its not great.

we just have to forget about all this conspiracy and envrionemtal crap and focus on the people affected and how to stop it happening again in the future.

who knows, hydrogen power of the future may see similar issues, so may gas turbine who knows.

end of my supposed mainstream rants .

Posted on: 2011/3/22 12:06
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer



« 1 2 (3)



You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]