User Login    
 + Register
  • Main navigation
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Fast Search
Slow Search
Google Ad



Browsing this Thread:   1 Anonymous Users





edis wiring opinions?
Just can't stay away
Joined:
2014/1/18 5:51
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 150
Offline
Y'all know a lot more than I do about the real world issues involved here. I'm an electrical engineer and I want to build everything like the signal path for an oscilloscope front end, but I bet that's goofy. Pics of the wiring diagrams for an EDIS setup show using twisted shielded pair wiring between the sensor and the control box, and same for the line that goes to the ECU that actually determines the spark advance setting. The latter one makes sense to me. The former one, eh, they're going to be within 20 cm of each other. But mostly: the existing wiring stubs on the boxes don't have STP wiring. They just have standard electrical wires, single ones at that, sticking out. I understand more than I'd like about radiated noise, and if there was any evidence Ford had made any attempt to actually shield these, I even have the wire for it. I still will, somehow, for the SAW line. But it seems just goofy to have two 10cm long single wires sticking out of the sensor, that I solder into a shielded twisted pair for 10cm, and then back into the individual wires going into the control box with some kludged together joint to the ground wire. I'm actually tempted to cut the control side short and do this the way I do at work, but, again, if Ford didn't, should I?

Posted on: 5/6 5:24
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: edis wiring opinions?
Just can't stay away
Joined:
2014/1/18 5:51
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 150
Offline
I just found this here:
https://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm ... ks_closeup_resize_100.jpg
So it looks like at least ddgonzal is also of the just twisted pair opinion.

Posted on: 5/6 5:40
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: edis wiring opinions?
No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster)
Joined:
2002/10/28 6:49
From under the Firmament LOL no twiglight effect BS
Group:
Registered Users
Posts: 10975
Offline
I get what you are saying about insulation
I always prefer insulation than Ford's cost cutting
then again tensor rings use this approach with copper
and probably balances out noise via vortex principles.
Gets spooky but wiring is just like alchemy in complexity
I just always try and hide the stuff, it pains me even
if the bonnet hides it, its there in my mind LOL

Posted on: 5/6 6:03
_________________
"Australia" is formed by all its geographically listed territories "including" Norfolk, Christmas & Cocos Islands. The word include excludes all else before it therefore you have no legal rights.
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer


Re: edis wiring opinions?
Moderator
Joined:
2001/5/3 7:04
From Kent, WA
Group:
Registered Users
Contentmaster
Usermaster
Posts: 31727
Offline
STP is a metal shield covering the two insulated wires


That photo is of GM coil packs and the EDIS controller, but was not my installation

between the EDIS module and the VR sensor, I used a stock Ford Aerostart VR sensor wire and connectors. I don't recall if it was STP or not
Open in new window



I specifically used STP on the cable between EDIS module and the ECU (MegaJolt Lite Jr). my notes says I used 10 feet of wire, because it had to go from front of engine into the cabin and I wanted to experiment with moving it around. I didn't cut the wire shorter, but never noticed any problems
Open in new window

Posted on: 5/6 8:56
Transfer the post to other applications Transfer






You can view topic.
You cannot start a new topic.
You cannot reply to posts.
You cannot edit your posts.
You cannot delete your posts.
You cannot add new polls.
You cannot vote in polls.
You cannot attach files to posts.
You cannot post without approval.

[Advanced Search]