No life (a.k.a. DattoMaster)
Joined: 2008/10/10 22:02
From Melbourne Australia (and likely under the car)
Group:
Registered Users
|
When you say it bogs down at lower rpm - just what sort of rpms are you talking about? Even with std style cam, you'll still have an rpm range too low for it to have great output and come out of a corner (or whatever) hard enough.
If it is below 2000rpm, there probably WON'T be a better cam for lower rpms.
definitely add me to the people suggesting checking (and pssibly running smaller) choke sizes. and also about general carb setup - making sure that tweaking the acc pump circuit is done, which should remove most flat spots (as opposed to 'genuine' bogging down because rpm is too low period.
If that isn't enough, and assuming the ignition advance curve suits the current setup, there's not too much you could do to improve it., but there are a couple of things:
Check the compression ratio, and depending on what it is, you might be able to machine the head and increase the compression ratio. Obviously you can't go too far with that, before it will be on the verge of pinging/detonation/pre-ignition. And just how high ytou can safely run depends on cam duration - the later the intake closes the more static comp you can run safely.
The other thing you could do, wth a mild cam like this is to alter the cam timing - i.e. advancing it say 2-4 degrees more than it currently is. This will close the intake valve sooner, and create more dynamic compression, and essentially will lift hte lower rpm output a bit (will drop a little up top though.) Obviously those two go hand in hand, so work out your current comp ratio and dynamic comp ratio and find how much you can increase the comp ratio with a cam that s 4 deg advanced, and basically do it). It won't be a night and day transformation, but it will certainly help.
If it is viable/convenient enough to source and allowed to be used, you could always go for a much higher comp ratio, even with the short cam duration and possibly advanced timing at that - and run it on e85. That'll boost the powr across the entire rpm (even the fuel alone with no increase in comp ratio, as the cooling effect of the ethanol ends up with a denser intake charge getting in there, but might as well get best of both worlds and up the comp ratio at the same time) - it'll boost output across the whole rpm range, but make throttle response and lower output noticeably better.
I'm wondering if _maybe_ just maybe this would be a case where a small port head, which would have decent velocity at lower rpm, esp on an a14 (vs say, an a12) will give it the wake up down lower that it needs. Of course that wouldn't be cheap, presumably still need 'some' portng and a new intake manifold.
If all of that wasn't enough the other thing I'd genuinely suggest, if you can source it cheaply enough, perhaps consider a different diff ratio, that means the rpms don't get too low. Other than that - an a15 with its longer stroke will get into its powerband at a lower rpm than an a14 wth the same head and cam - probably somewhere in the neighbourhood of 200rpm earlier. This might just be enough to prevent it droping off the bottom edge of the powerband.
Posted on: 2010/7/27 8:56
|