I was planning on starting with the seemingly less common dual belt front pulley. I only know of them as they were on the previous a15 i had. It seems everyone likes the single pulley (which also has triangle or 'piece of pie' shaped holes around the entire hub section. I suspect for lightness What i planned was simply drilling and tapping the double pulley one, and using the pulley from a belt driven OHC setup (which due to their 'offset' will allow it to sit over the top of that outside smaller diameter pulley section and dowelling it in place (referenced from the centre somehow, with a piece of round bar turned down on a lathe) and then bolting the two together (mspaint on request).
This heavier less desired (by the NA crew) pulley would be stronger, and should hold up.
I am aware of the cracking issue, and I'd suspect it is partly due to the lighter weight of the pulley and the rpm it may be subjected to.
I'm hoping I won't have to adapt a fluid filled style damper but don't 100% rule it out. It will certainly fix the cracking issue. I do also know a bloke who is a magician at repairing cracked pulleys, so there's alway that option if need be.
In my case, I want the heavier pulley to start with (and am certainly not against the idea of a custom one).
Using the 'cam belt' and pulleys limits the drive ratio to either 1:1 or 2:1 (or 1:2 if it were put on a sub 1 litre engine I supppose) - using either 2 cam pulleys, or one crank and ne cam pulley.
I plan to run without the electromagnetic clutch, and have it running all the time. So the toothed belts won't cause an issue on that front. The reason i planned for that is that the first sc14 I picked up, which is in good condition, came cheaply as someone had buggered the clutch and then locked it solid with screws through the pulley/hub to lock them together. I planned to delete the clutch altogether and just run the toothed pulley. It's been done before:
This pic was on a geocities site, all of which were closed down a few years back, I happened to have it on the harddrive - so I'll upload here
Obviously there are otber issues on the pictured s/c drive setup pic that I would tend to avoid - for one thing the huge roller coaster, loop the loop intake tract - for a second, intercooling after the s/c (actually that isn't pictured in that pic, they put the cooler on later) They had it (at the end) on a 2:1 drive ratio - and were spinning the motor to something like 5500rpm (therefore 11,000 blower rpm). The a15 is less than half the size, so presumably a 1:1 drive ratio would give good boost, but also not push blower rpm too high
The cam/crank pulleys on any specific engine will only allow a the mentioned 1:2 1:1 and 1:2 drive ratios. What I _am_ wondering is whether there happen to be standards when it comes to toothed belt tooth size and gap - so that the pulleys from some other engines occasionally have the same tooth size/spacing. Maybe it could get really lucky and (for arguments sake) the one set had 40/20 teeth, and another had 30/15 teeth on the cam/crank sprockets specifically - then mixing a 30 and a 40 give a 3:4 or 4:3 ratio - or simplified to a 1.33:1 or 1:1.33 drive ratio - or whatever the numbers may be. I don't know that this actually occurs, but if it did it'd be fantastic to find and document which engine/models had compatible pulley tooth spacing/sizes and a tooth count for each so everyone could go about tailorin their boost levels with stuff from the wrecking yards.
If that was a no go, I'd also look into the 'gilmer belt drive' conversion sets. They aren't great for alternator and water pump bearings as they move the pulley forward to clear the existing fan belt/groove areas - loading the bearings due to far more leverage But on a s/c - where you _want_ it to clear the alternator/water pump belt, and leave it intact, _and_ the blower pulley fitment can be close to the front of the casing, no exacerbating effects/premature wear of the s/c bearings. So that _might_ be the other place I'll look.
So I plan to run it constantly driven, and drawthrough (on lpg, since I know lpg stuff like the back of my hand, and due to price per litre - it's slightly higher octane than pump fuel, but with varying butane content, not astronomically higher, at least not any more afaik, though I do note a couple of places do sell 100% propane) -
Anyhoo - there seems to be 2 schools of thought as to why these blowers expire (aside from just trying to spin them at a way too high rpm or boost level that nothing would survive) - either it's being 'on' too much and they just eventually deteriorate in condition under the stress. The other one I've heard put forward is that direct driving them and having them running all the time, at part throttle with barely any air passing through to cool them is an issue. But I'd counter that by saying if the air density is very low at part throttle, there's less effort/stress/compression happening in the blower casing, and it won't heat up (beyond heat conducted through the manifold(s) attached to the engine and some convection) at part throttle anyway.
In any event, I do have a spare low mile sc14 with a good clutch so if the whole thing expires in a month or two, I'll swap in the new blower and re-vise the intake/blower switching ability to sort it.
Being a dry fuel metered in in gaseous state, the lpg won't have any cooling effect on the blower rotor/lobes, but it also won't have any solvent like effect that might compromise the surface layer(s) of the blower lobes which should be a good thing. I plan to run water injection, and do so pre-blower, so that it might have some (limited) cooling effect on the blower at higher boost levels, where it might be heating up. As long as it is introduced as a fine mist (rather that a solid jet/stream of water like very eariy turbo water injection setups had - that were sometimes aimed at the SU carb needle, or the holley booster venturi region to try and atomise it, or if all else failed it'd happen to some extent at the turbo compressor wheel region) - so anyway as long as it is a fine mist, it should be ok (or at the very least, it won't do any harm)
Lpg doesn't experience 'dropout' through tight bends like liquid fuels to, so in that regard, I can get a little bit tighter with the bends from lpg mixer/carb to the supercharger inlet and to a slightly lesser extent from supercharger to intake manifold. (that being to a lesser extent owing to the fact it'd have some water mist in there at that point when it sees enough boost)
A14force - if I can't manage to get a factory based pulley to survive, I'd be very keen to buy one of yours. Out of interest - what sort of money would you be after for one? and what belt type is it to suit - traditional v belts, ribbed belts, toothed belts?